Judge Upholds Talc Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson
A judge has upheld a $117 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier Imerys Tal America Inc. The damages were awarded to New Jersey man Stephen Lanzo, who claimed to have developed mesothelioma due to decades of using Johnson’s Baby Powder. The suit was the first mesothelioma verdict involving J&J talc products.
Ovarian Cancer Talc Verdict Overturned
While this verdict has been upheld, another verdict against the company has been overturned in Missouri. In 2016, a jury awarded South Dakota resident Gloria Ristesund $55 million in a lawsuit against J&J. The suit claimed the company’s talc products used by the plaintiff for feminine hygiene caused her to develop ovarian cancer, resulting in a hysterectomy.
The appellate court found that the suit should not have been filed in Missouri, as the plaintiff was not a Missouri resident and the defendant was not headquartered there. The decision was based on a 2017 Supreme Court ruling that limits where lawsuits may be brought.
“While it is important for consumers to hold these companies accountable, it is also crucial that the law be upheld, and proper legal processes must always be followed,” said Attorney Walter Clark, founder of Walter Clark Legal Group.
Our firm has been handling personal injury cases throughout the California Low Desert and High Desert communities for over 30 years. With a 95% success rate, the California personal injury attorneys at Walter Clark Legal Group will fight to hold those responsible for your loss accountable and win compensation to cover medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. If you have been injured by a defective product and want to discuss your legal options, contact us today at (760) 777-7777 for a free consultation with an experienced personal injury lawyer. We have offices in Indio, Rancho Mirage, Victorville, El Centro, and Yucca Valley, and represent clients through the entire California Low Desert and High Desert communities.
DISCLAIMER: The Walter Clark Legal Group blog is intended for general information purposes only and is not intended as legal or medical advice. References to laws are based on general legal practices and vary by location. Information reported comes from secondary news sources. We do handle these types of cases, but whether or not the individuals and/or loved ones involved in these accidents choose to be represented by a law firm is a personal choice we respect. Should you find any of the information incorrect, we welcome you to contact us with corrections.